TNBGGA: The No Bullshit Guide to Genetic Analysis

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • chapter_17 • chapter_07 • chapter_02 • chapter_16 • chapter_06 • how_to_use_this_book • glossary • chapter_14
chapter_02

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
chapter_02 [2024/08/26 19:25] – mikechapter_02 [2025/01/29 08:32] (current) – [The complementation test can be used to group different mutants into unique genes] mike
Line 1: Line 1:
-<typo fs:x-large>**Chapter 02: Defining genes by function**</typo>+<- chapter_01|Chapter 01^table_of_contents|Table of Contents^chapter_03|Chapter 03 -> 
 +<typo fs:x-large>**Chapter 02: Defining %%genes%% by function**</typo>
  
 ===== What is a gene? Why do we care? ===== ===== What is a gene? Why do we care? =====
  
-Generally speaking, the answer to "what is a gene" has already largely been answered by scientists. Starting from [[wp>Gregor_Mendel|Gregor Mendel's]] famous pea plant experiments in the 1860s to define the patterns of how observable traits (i.e., phenotypes) are inherited from parents to offspring, and culminating in the discovery of the structure of DNA by James Watson, Francis Crick, Rosalind Franklin, and Maurice Wilkins in the 1950s, there was a scientific golden age in the second half of the 20th century that not only led to a clear understanding of the physical nature of a gene, it further allowed scientists to fully catalogue all the genes (i.e., the genome) of many organisms, including humans. While 20th century geneticists typically studied only a few genes at a time, new 21st century technologies allow scientists to study thousands of genes simultaneously in a single experiment - sometimes from a single cell! Genes are talked about even in casual conversation among non-scientists. As a student of biology, you probably already have at least a general idea of what a gene is - it's instructive for students to think about your prior knowledge on genes before reading further.+Generally speaking, the answer to "what is a gene" has already largely been answered by scientists. Starting from [[wp>Gregor_Mendel|Gregor Mendel's]] famous pea plant experiments in the 1860s to define the patterns of how observable traits (i.e., phenotypes) are inherited from parents to offspring, and culminating in the discovery of the structure of DNA by [[wp>James_Watson|James Watson]], [[wp>Francis_Crick|Francis Crick]], [[wp>Rosalind_Franklin|Rosalind Franklin]], and [[wp>Maurice_Wilkins|Maurice Wilkins]] in the 1950s, there was a scientific golden age in the second half of the 20th century that not only led to a clear understanding of the physical nature of a gene, it further allowed scientists to fully catalogue all the genes (i.e., the genome) of many organisms, including humans. While 20th century geneticists typically studied only a few genes at a time, new 21st century technologies allow scientists to study thousands of genes simultaneously in a single experiment - sometimes from a single cell! Genes are talked about even in casual conversation among non-scientists. As a student of biology, you probably already have at least a general idea of what a gene is - it's instructive for students to think about your prior knowledge on genes before reading further.
  
 <WRAP center round tip 60%> <WRAP center round tip 60%>
Line 40: Line 41:
 ==== Genetic nomenclature in yeast ==== ==== Genetic nomenclature in yeast ====
  
-In yeast, gene names use three letters usually followed by a number ($MATα$ and $MATa$ are exceptions) and are written with italics. Recessive mutant alleles are written in lowercase (e.g., $his3$) and dominant alleles (which are usually but not always the wildtype allele) are written in all caps ($HIS3$). When talking about a gene in a generic sense without regard to a specific allele, either uppercase or lowercase can be used, although conventionally lowercase tends to be used more commonly. Some mutants in different genes might appear superficially similar (e.g., $his2$ and $his3$ are both histidine auxotrophs), so phenotypes (defined further below) typically are written without the gene number; the first letter is capitalized, and "+" and "-" are used for wildtype and defective (His<sup>+</sup> refers to a prototroph, His<sup>-</sup> refers to a histidine auxotroph; both terms are defined further below). Protein made from the $his3$ gene is written as His3 (first letter capitalized, no italics). Sometimes proteins are written as His3p to put emphasis on the protein aspect. In weird cases (see $CUP1^r$ below) you can use superscript to indicate special situations such as a dominant allele or drug resistance, or to emphasize wildtype (e.g., $CUP1^+$). +In yeast, gene names use three letters usually followed by a number ($MATα$ and $MATa$ are exceptions) and are written with italics. Recessive mutant alleles are written in lowercase (e.g., $his3$) and dominant alleles (which are usually but not always the wildtype allele) are written in all caps ($HIS3$). When talking about a gene in a generic sense without regard to a specific allele, either uppercase or lowercase can be used, although conventionally lowercase tends to be used more commonly. Some mutants in different genes might appear superficially similar (e.g., $his2$ and $his3$ are both histidine auxotrophs), so phenotypes (defined further below) typically are written without the gene number; the first letter is capitalized, and "+" and "-" are used for wildtype and defective (His<sup>+</sup> refers to a prototroph, His<sup>-</sup> refers to a histidine auxotroph; both terms are defined further below). Protein made from the $his3$ gene is written as His3 (first letter capitalized, no italics). Sometimes proteins are written as His3p to put emphasis on the protein aspect. In weird cases (see $CUP1^r$ below) you can use superscript to indicate special situations such as a dominant allele or drug resistance, or to emphasize wildtype (e.g., $CUP1^+$). 
 ==== The yeast lifecycle ==== ==== The yeast lifecycle ====
  
-In the laboratory, we can grow yeast either on a Petri dish (Fig. {{ref>Fig1}}) or in some kind of liquid media in a container such as an Erlenmeyer flask or test tube. Yeast can reproduce sexually, but instead of saying they have two sexes (such as male and female) we say there are two mating types. Yeast cells can exist as haploids of either mating type α ($MATα$) or mating type a ($MATa$). Haploid cells of different mating types when mixed together will fuse to form a diploid cell. Both haploid and diploid cells can undergo mitosis to make more clones of themselves. Diploid cells can also undergo meiosis and form four ascospores that can germinate and become four haploid cells. Two of these cells will be $MATα$ and the other two will be $MATa$ (Fig. {{ref>Fig2}}). +In the laboratory, we can grow yeast either on a Petri dish (Fig. {{ref>Fig1}}) or in some kind of liquid media in a container such as an Erlenmeyer flask or test tube. Yeast can reproduce sexually, but instead of saying they have two sexes (such as male and female) we say there are two mating types. Yeast cells can exist as haploids of either mating type α ($MATα$) or mating type a ($MATa$). Haploid cells of different mating types when mixed together will fuse to form a diploid cell. Both haploid and diploid cells can undergo mitosis to make more clones of themselves. Diploid cells can also undergo meiosis and form four ascospores that can germinate and become four haploid cells. Two of these cells will be $MATα$ and the other two will be $MATa$ (Fig. {{ref>Fig2}}). 
 <figure Fig2> <figure Fig2>
  
Line 53: Line 52:
  
    
-Yeast cells can exist as either haploid or diploid cells. The haploids are either mating type a ($MATa$; shown in red) or mating type α ($MATα$, shown in purple). The haploid cells can undergo mitosis to form more clones of themselves, or they can mate by fusing together to form a diploid. The diploid can undergo mitosis to form more clones of itself, or it can undergo meiosis to form four haploid daughter cells. Technically, four ascospores are formed. We will talk about ascospores and their role in tetrad analysis in Appendix A. Source: [[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yeast_lifecycle.svg|Wikimedia]]. Licensing: Public domain. +Yeast cells can exist as either haploid or diploid cells. The haploids are either mating type a ($MATa$; shown in red) or mating type α ($MATα$, shown in purple). The haploid cells can undergo mitosis to form more clones of themselves, or they can mate by fusing together to form a diploid. The diploid can undergo mitosis to form more clones of itself, or it can undergo meiosis to form four haploid daughter cells. Four ascospores are formed. We will talk about ascospores and their role in tetrad analysis in [[appendix_A|Appendix A]]. Source: [[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yeast_lifecycle.svg|Wikimedia]]. Licensing: Public domain. 
 </caption> </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 75: Line 74:
 </caption> </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
-Each intermediate compound in the pathway is converted to the next compound through a chemical reaction catalyzed by an enzyme (A is converted to B, B is converted to C, etc.). If there is a mutation that somehow affects the function of enzyme 3, then intermediate C cannot be converted to intermediate D and ultimately the cell cannot make histidine. Such a mutant will only grow if histidine is provided in the growth medium. This type of mutant is known as an auxotroph or auxotrophic mutant. This type of mutation is known as an auxotrophic mutation. A strain refers to a collection of individual organisms of a particular genotype (in the case of yeast, individual cells) that can be propagated in perpetuity. It's easy to maintain most yeast strains – all you need to do is provide them with food (sugars) and they will go through mitosis to make more copies of themselves. +Each intermediate compound in the pathway is converted to the next compound through a chemical reaction catalyzed by an enzyme (A is converted to B, B is converted to C, etc.). If there is a change in a gene (i.e., a mutation) that somehow affects the function of enzyme 3, then intermediate C cannot be converted to intermediate D and ultimately the cell cannot make histidine. Such a mutant will only grow if histidine is provided in the growth medium. This type of mutant is known as an auxotroph or auxotrophic mutant. This type of mutation is known as an auxotrophic mutation. A strain refers to a particular genetic variant of an organism that can be propagated in perpetuity. It's easy to maintain most yeast strains – all you need to do is provide them with food (sugars) and they will go through mitosis to make more copies of themselves. 
  
 ==== Defining dominant and recessive alleles ==== ==== Defining dominant and recessive alleles ====
Line 157: Line 156:
 </table> </table>
  
-Having performed this cross: if the two mutants don't complement, we conclude that they are mutant in the same gene.  ((In rare cases, just because two mutants do not complement each other does not automatically mean that the mutants have mutations in the same gene. There can be situations called "non-allelic non-complementation" where mutations in different genes do not complement each other. You can show that non-complementing mutations are in different genes by mapping their position ([[chapter_05|Chapter 05]]). When two different genes show non-allelic non-complementation, that can be an indication that the gene products of the two genes (usually the proteins encoded by the genes) have some sort of physical interaction.)) Another way we say this is that "$hisX$ is allelic to $his3$". Conversely, if they do complement, we conclude that they are mutant in different genes. For instance, $hisX$ might be a mutation in the $his4$ gene. To understand the reasoning behind this conclusion, look at the genotypes of the diploid in the two possible outcomes of this experiment.+Having performed this cross: if the two mutants don't complement, we conclude that they are mutant in the same gene.  ((In rare cases, just because two mutants do not complement each other does not automatically mean that the mutants have mutations in the same gene. There can be situations called "non-allelic non-complementation" where mutations in different genes do not complement each other. You can show that non-complementing mutations are in different genes by mapping their position ([[chapter_05|Chapter 05]]). When two different genes show non-allelic non-complementation, that can be an indication that the gene products of the two genes (usually the proteins encoded by the genes) have some sort of physical interaction.)) Another way we say this is that "$hisX$ is allelic to $his3$". Conversely, if they do complement, we conclude that they are mutant in different genes. For instance, $hisX$ might be a mutation in the $his4$ gene. 
  
-This works because in row 2 of Table {{ref>Tab4}}, the $his3$ haploid parent is presumed to be mutant only in the $his3$ gene and therefore implicitly carries the wildtype $HISX$ allele, and similarly the $hisX$ haploid parent is presumed to be mutant only in this one gene and thus implicitly carries the wildtype $HIS3$ allele. Therefore, the diploid produced from the cross will be heterozygous for both the $his3$ and $hisX$ genes and therefore provide normal function for both genes. It is important to know that this test only works for recessive mutations.+To understand the reasoning behind this conclusion, look at the combination of alleles (i.e., the genotype) of the diploid in the two possible outcomes of this experiment. In row 2 of Table {{ref>Tab4}}, the $his3$ haploid parent is presumed to be mutant only in the $his3$ gene and therefore implicitly carries the wildtype $HISX$ allele, and similarly the $hisX$ haploid parent is presumed to be mutant only in this one gene and thus implicitly carries the wildtype $HIS3$ allele. Therefore, the diploid produced from the cross will be heterozygous for both the $his3$ and $hisX$ genes and therefore provide normal function for both genes. It is important to know that this test only works for recessive mutations.
  
 The beauty of the complementation test is that the trait can serve as a read-out of gene function even without knowledge of what the gene is doing. We can simply define a gene based on its function, and we can distinguish between different genes (assuming we have recessive mutant alleles of those genes) using the complementation test. In fact, you can even use the complementation test for mutants that have different phenotypes! The only requirement for the complementation test is that the two mutants must be recessive.  The beauty of the complementation test is that the trait can serve as a read-out of gene function even without knowledge of what the gene is doing. We can simply define a gene based on its function, and we can distinguish between different genes (assuming we have recessive mutant alleles of those genes) using the complementation test. In fact, you can even use the complementation test for mutants that have different phenotypes! The only requirement for the complementation test is that the two mutants must be recessive. 
chapter_02.1724725503.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/26 19:25 by mike